Handsome older man in a blue suit, gold accents, bold gold text 'Cash Ready for Crashes' and subtitle 'Portfolio Growth Strategy,' elegant gold financial chart line showing a sharp drop (crash) followed by a strong recovery, dark blue background.

Using Munger’s “Cash Ready for Crashes” Method: Quantifying Its Effect on Portfolio Growth

By /

Charlie Munger, Warren Buffett’s longtime partner at Berkshire Hathaway, consistently emphasized the importance of holding cash—“dry powder”—to deploy during market downturns. The idea sounds simple: buy quality assets at distressed prices when fear creates opportunity.

But how much does this strategy actually improve long-term portfolio growth—after accounting for the cash drag that slows compounding during bull markets?

This article delivers concrete scenarios, clear drag calculations, and Berkshire-level real-world evidence. We compare 15% versus 30% cash allocations across moderate (50%) and extreme (66%) crashes, revealing the optimal hybrid approach for modern investors.

The Setup and Core Mechanics

Start with a 100-unit portfolio.

  • 30% cash reserve holds 30 units, deploying 20 during major crashes.
  • 15% cash reserve holds 15 units, deploying 10.
  • Cash buys new stocks, creating additional compounding paths that run independently of the core portfolio.

We model two crash types:

  • 50% drop (common bear markets)
  • 66% drop (severe crises resembling 2008 for select financial stocks)

These scenarios reveal the raw power of “dry powder”—and the real cost of holding too much.

Scenario A: Extreme Crash (66% Decline)

A stock falls 66% and eventually recovers to its previous value.

  • 30% cash:
    Deploy 20 units → becomes 60 units on recovery (3×).
    Equivalent to a 40% total portfolio gain, compounding over four events:
    3.84× total growth (1 × 1.4⁴).
  • 15% cash:
    Deploy 10 units → becomes 30 units (20% total gain).
    Compounds to 2.07× (1 × 1.2⁴).

Berkshire’s real example:
In 2008, Buffett and Munger used $5 billion from Berkshire’s $31 billion cash pile to secure Goldman Sachs preferred shares—producing billions in gains.

Scenario B: Moderate Crash (50% Decline)

A 50% drop doubles deployed cash.

  • 30% cash: 20 → 40 units (20% gain), compounding to 2.07×.
  • 15% cash: 10 → 20 units (10% gain), compounding to 1.46×.

Cash Drag Over 50 Years

(Stocks 10% annualized, Cash 3%)

Assume a 100-unit baseline portfolio with fixed long-term allocations and no rebalancing.

Portfolio Value After 50 Years

  • 15% cash:
    85×1.1⁵⁰ + 15×1.03⁵⁰ ≈ 10,044 units
  • 30% cash:
    70×1.1⁵⁰ + 30×1.03⁵⁰ ≈ 8,349 units
  • 100% stock:
    100×1.1⁵⁰ ≈ 11,739 units

A 30% cash portfolio ends at 83% of a 15% cash portfolio—roughly a 17% drag caused purely by extra idle cash.

Crash Multiplier Table

Crash Type30% Cash15% Cash
Moderate (50%)2.07×1.46×
Extreme (66%)3.84×2.07×

50-Year Hybrid Comparison

StrategyCash %No Crashes+4 Moderate+4 Extreme
No Cash0%11,73911,73911,739
15% Cash15%10,04414,66420,791
30% Cash30%8,34917,28232,056

Assumptions

  • Stocks compound at 10% annually.
  • Cash compounds at 3% annually.
  • Crashes fully recover before the next crash.
  • Portfolios compound for 50 years without annual rebalancing.
  • After each crash recovery, allocations are reset to target cash percentages.

Performance Insights

If crashes occur, the 30% cash allocation wins—its larger opportunistic buying power creates massive long-term advantages during recoveries.

However, if no crashes happen, the No Cash portfolio wins due to zero drag and maximum stock exposure.

The 15% allocation provides a balanced middle ground—a significant opportunity without the heavy drag penalty of 30% cash.

Extended Reader Takeaway: Preparing, Deploying, and Optimizing Cash in Crashes

Risk tolerance matters:
Select a cash allocation that aligns with your comfort level regarding volatility. Larger cash reserves can outperform if they are deployed decisively during downturns.

Be ready:
Maintain a consistent baseline cash reserve so you’re prepared for periods of market panic.

Buy at the opportunity:
During meaningful declines, use cash to acquire high-quality assets at distressed prices. A gradual, staged deployment manages uncertainty around market bottoms.

Always leave some cash on the table:
Avoid deploying 100% of your dry powder at once. Retaining a small amount allows you to capitalize if prices fall further.

Optional nuance:
After the market recovers, gradually rebalancing back to your baseline cash level can optimize long-term compounding. This is a stylistic choice, not a strict requirement.

Caveat: Extreme Crashes and Future Return Expectations

Historical recoveries provide confidence, but severe crashes introduce uncertainty. Long recovery periods or asymmetric bear markets may reduce realized returns relative to a smooth 10% annualization assumption.

Holding cash helps manage these risks. It is a strategy designed for flexibility and resilience—not prediction or timing perfection.

CAGR Summary

PortfolioNo Crash (Value/CAGR)+4 Moderate+4 Extreme
100% Stocks11,739 / 10.00%samesame
15% Cash10,044 / 9.66%14,664 / 10.49%20,791 / 11.26%
30% Cash8,349 / 9.25%17,282 / 10.85%32,056 / 12.23%

Cash drag lowers CAGR in calm markets.
Crash deployment raises CAGR above the 10% baseline—with larger gains for larger cash positions.

Conclusion: The Sweet Spot

For investors following Munger’s philosophy:

  • 30% cash wins in a crash-heavy environment.
  • 15% cash wins in a stable or low-crash environment.
  • Your ideal allocation depends on risk tolerance, patience, and how aggressively you deploy during market stress.

The sweet spot for most investors is often somewhere in the middle—holding enough dry powder to be opportunistic without sacrificing the power of long-term compounding.

Sources

Scroll to Top